Picture the buzz of a trading floor where the boldest investors chase the next big win: emerging markets are their playground. These markets draw in the daredevils of finance, much like day traders drawn to volatile penny stocks. The promise? Rapid gains and untapped potential. While this perspective sounds full of opportunity to the uninitiated, the reality is that these markets
come with significant challenges and unpredictability. After all, it is no secret that higher potential returns come with higher risk.
As the financial world shifts its focus from established regions to the rising frontiers of Asia, Latin America, and Africa, it is only natural that investment banks follow, always seeking the greater profits. But what exactly are the opportunities for these financial giants in these emerging and often unstructured markets? While the prospects may be appealing, investment banks must also consider what is at stake, balancing the promise of growth with the realities of
uncertainty and risk.
Before diving in, it’s important to define the concepts at the heart of our topic, beginning with investment banks. Essentially, these are institutions that help people navigate capital markets by providing specialized advice and hands-on assistance. Think of them as the tourist guides of finance, always by your side, striving to optimize outcomes for themselves, their firms, and their clients alike. A major motivator for many working in investment banking is that compensation
depends on commissions, which drives them to maximize performance and ensure that their clients’ navigation is as seamless as possible.
Emerging markets serve as the dynamic landscapes where this navigation takes place. Often complex and somewhat blurry, these markets are defined by their volatility because they are in constant, rapid development. Just as today’s developed countries underwent urbanization decades ago, emerging markets are experiencing this transformation right now. This not only makes them attractive due to their rapid economic growth, but also because they are breeding grounds for increasing demand: businesses and people are constantly seeking new resources.
That’s why investment banks move into these markets: people need navigators in this sea of unknowns. However, like sailors exploring uncharted waters, investment banks also face obstacles. Whether it’s dealing with lunatic politicians, complicated legal frameworks that often make little sense, or a currency that behaves like a rollercoaster, the difficulties are definitely
there.
To begin with, let’s navigate the murky waters of emerging markets by quantitatively and accurately assessing their risks using the Global Emerging Markets Risk Database Consortium (GEMs), an initiative that provides one of the most comprehensive datasets from multilateral development banks and other financial institutions, collecting data on default and recovery rates from development projects. This credit risk database helps investors better understand the emerging market environment by clearly laying the numbers on the table.
To better understand GEMs, it is important to first define two key terms around which this database revolves. The recovery rate refers to the percentage of the total amount owed on a loan that the lender manages to recover after the borrower fails to meet the terms of debt repayment. In other words, it’s how much money is recovered after “bankruptcy”: this rate tends to be lower in emergent economies. The default rate is the percentage of borrowers who fail to
meet these debt repayment terms; it shows how many clients fail to repay. This is how GEMs measure the risk of investing in emerging markets.
The average default rate for loans to private sector firms in emerging markets is 3.6%, which is similar to the default rates of non-investment grade firms in advanced economies. This means that private sector loans in emerging economies perform similarly to investments rated BBB in developed markets.
This finding refutes the claim that emerging markets carry higher default risk than similar-risk investments in developed markets. The landscape might not be as rough as we thought after all. In fact, default rates in the GEMs portfolio did not rise as much as those of firms in developed countries during periods of economic downturn, highlighting one benefit of emerging markets that often attracts finance thrill-seekers: diversification. Investments in emerging markets often act as good components of diversified portfolios because they tend not to be correlated with other investments. Imagine your portfolio being a fleet of boats: just because one sinks doesn’t mean the others will, thanks to the low correlation between emerging markets and other investments (the former tends to move independently).
Additionally, this same principle of diversification is applicable within emerging markets: with over 70 countries encompassing various governments and economies, the range of options is undoubtedly broad.
To fully cover this risk assessment, I must also introduce sovereign credit ratings, which evaluate the risk of a government defaulting on its debt obligations. To many investors’ surprise, there is a rift between default rates of emerging nations and their sovereign risk ratings.
However, investors have long based their risk assessments on these sovereign ratings alone, which has therefore led to misjudgements, according to the GEMs. Consequently, the waters may be clearer than many investors: despite perceptions, investments in emerging markets perform similarly to comparable-risk investments, with no greater likelihood of failure.
As noted earlier, emerging economies are undergoing urbanization, leading to significant growth in infrastructure, real estate, technology, and manufacturing sectors. These developments present substantial investment opportunities for investment banks, which play a crucial role in providing capital to these key businesses and facilitating IPOs. Emerging markets often resemble startup environments, with investment bankers acting as advisors who ensure smooth
financial development.
Moreover, a crucial point to highlight is that over ⅔ of the world’s population resides in emerging markets. Many of these countries have not yet progressed beyond Stage 2 or Stage 3 of the demographic transition model, which means their birth rates remain significantly higher than their death rates, leading to rapid population growth. This expanding, youthful population contrasts sharply with developed nations, where aging populations will soon result in slower
economic output, while emerging markets are poised to experience increasing economic productivity due to their growing young workforce.
Returning to the topic of supply chain reorganization, it is important to note that supply chain diversification is highly advantageous in today’s geopolitical climate. As companies shift their operations toward the 70 countries classified as emerging markets, these regions increasingly become fertile ground for business growth.
TCW reports that equities in emerging markets currently trade at a 42% discount compared to the S& P 500 Index, based on forward price-to-earnings ratios (forward-looking valuation of a stock). This substantial valuation gap demonstrates how uncertainty weighs on investor sentiment, causing emerging market equities to be priced well below their fundamental value. If there was disappointment about missing out on opportunities during past market crashes when assets were deeply undervalued, a similar situation now exists in emerging markets: investors have the chance to buy quality stocks “on sale” before valuations inevitably recover.
While we have outlined the significant growth potential of emerging markets, it is important to acknowledge the drawbacks and challenges that can undermine their promise:
As I’ve mentioned previously, political instability and the geopolitical shadow that hangs over emerging markets a prominent factors that might push away investors and banks from entering these fast-paced developing markets. Not only are they often repulsed by sovereign credit ratings, but the uncertainty that dominates the political state of these nations is often a big turnoff. According to JP Morgan Private Bank’s client survey, more than ⅓ of clients fear geopolitical risks, which are a big characteristic of emerging markets. However, it is important to note that “ almost 90% of the geopolitical events have not changed the direction of the world economy, “ which means that fear is often exaggerated in a certain way.
However, it is worth noting that volatile politics can sometimes benefit investment banks. For example, JP Morgan traders experienced one of their strongest years during Trump’s second term. While this discussion focuses on U.S. politics, the same principle, that risk and volatility can generate high returns, applies to emerging markets as well, particularly when policy shifts
affect trade between developed and emerging economies.
Another notable risk is foreign exchange rate risk. Since foreign investments generate returns in local currency, fluctuations in exchange rates can significantly affect the total return when those gains are converted back into the investor’s domestic currency.
Furthermore, even if data platforms like the GEMS database or TCW suggest that ocean currents in emerging markets appear stable, the quality of navigation remains a major concern, comparable to steering without the sight of the seafloor. Financial reporting in emerging markets often lacks the precision seen in developed economies, as performance is less frequently and rigorously tracked. This deficiency undermines reliability and overall credibility. As noted in the
CFO Journal, inadequate reporting of liabilities frequently results in their understatement. Payments are commonly misrecorded due to insufficient documentation of supplier agreements.
Adding to the uncertainty that looms over emerging markets, investment banks may also face challenges arising from tax regimes that shift alongside the volatility of the political climate.
In conclusion, emerging markets act as hidden treasure troves, capable of delivering substantial returns but challenging newcomers to navigate. While the risk assessment is more favorable than expected, pronounced political instability and shifting tax regimes contribute to ongoing volatility. Much of this turbulence stems from these markets still moving through phases two and three of the demographic transition model. Yet, their youthful populations drive workforce growth and economic productivity, distinguishing them from developed economies. Right now, emerging markets are approaching their apex, and witnessing this rise is a unique opportunity. This prospect of undervaluation and untapped growth prompts investment banks to set up operations, despite the persistent opacity in financial reporting.
Comments